Tue, 09:14 16 Jun 2009 GMT17

 
UN refugee chief says Pakistan aid in donor 'self interest'
15 Jun 2009 15:02:00 GMT
Written by: Emma Batha
U.N. refugee agency chief Antonio Guterres<BR>REUTERS/Denis Balibouse
U.N. refugee agency chief Antonio Guterres
REUTERS/Denis Balibouse

Donor countries should dig deep into their pockets to help 2.5 million people displaced in Pakistan as a matter of "enlightened self interest", the United Nation's refugee chief says.

U.N. High Commissioner for Refugees Antonio Guterres told AlertNet in an interview his agency was not even able to help half the people uprooted by Pakistan's military offensive to expel Taliban militants in the northwest Swat valley and neighbouring areas.

The U.N. refugee agency, UNHCR, has called for $105 million but has so far received only $28.5 million, or just over a quarter.

"If you combine volume and speed this is by far the most challenging internal displacement crisis I remember," Guterres said. "I don't recall any internal displacement crisis in which so many people have moved in such a short amount of time."

Guterres also warned that people were still being uprooted by the fighting. Aid workers are bracing for another 500,000 people as the military widens its operations to Waziristan - part of a region from where the Taliban orchestrate their war in neighbouring Afghanistan.

The refugee chief said donors were failing to cough up partly because they did not appreciate the scale of the crisis and its wider implications.

"It's not only a humanitarian problem," he said. "There's an importance to the world that goes far beyond the national dimension and I think this has not yet been perceived by many people."

The financial crisis had also affected funding, but Guterres said if countries could find hundreds of billions of dollars to rescue banks they should be able to stump up hundreds of millions for the crisis in Pakistan.

"We have at least to have the same enthusiasm in rescuing people as we have rescuing banks," he added.

"This is an emergency in which the dimension of the humanitarian crisis and the potential impact in international relations as a whole is such that to support the people is not only a matter of solidarity it's a matter of enlightened self interest."

BACKLASH RISK

Pakistan's military launched operations to clear the Taliban from the northwest in April. The public largely backs the offensive, but support could evaporate if civilians are seen to be languishing in misery. The vast majority of people forced to flee their homes are living with host families - often complete strangers.

"We are very worried that the international community will not be able to respond to the dramatic dimension of this problem," Guterres said. "And not doing so (will) risk increased factors of instability in an area where more than 2.5 million people are being received by host communities that are not rich.

"You should not forget that less than 20 percent of the displaced are in camps. More than 80 percent are living with families and this represents a huge problem to an area that also sustains 1.8 million Afghan refugees and an area in which the economic situation is extremely, extremely dire."

The United Nations launched an overall appeal for Pakistan last month for $543 million, but has only received about a quarter of this.

Guterres said the problems in financing operations in Pakistan highlighted the need for a fresh look at humanitarian funding.

"If you look at humanitarian funding it is really a drop in the ocean and I believe it would be useful to review the whole system and the way it works," he said.

"(I'd like to see) more predictable funding. In the U.N. you have many areas where funding is guaranteed, for instance peacekeeping operation ... Humanitarian action has only voluntary contributions."

Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  |   Digg Digg  |   NewsVine NewsVine  |   Reddit Reddit   
UNHCR news

We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.

Leave a Reply

Enter the code shown on the left *

When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.

Unlike some other content on this website, the written content in this article may be republished or redistributed by any means free of charge. Any use of photographs and graphics on this website is expressly prohibited. You must check whether written content contained in other articles on this website may be republished or redistributed without the express permission of Reuters or the relevant third party provider.

Emma Batha joined AlertNet in 2005 after four years on the Reuters international editing desk in London. She has previously worked as a reporter on the South China Morning Post in Hong Kong and was Asia Pacific editor at BBC News Online.

Related articles

Breaking stories
Africa Democratic Republic of the Congo: Life in Limbo

Asia Indian and Pakistani leaders meet in Russia

AlertNet insight
Asia UN refugee chief says Pakistan aid in donor 'self interest'

Aid agency news feed
Lack of funds and insecurity hitting Pakistan aid efforts

Blogs
Africa $130m for Ronaldo? That's a lot of school meals

Maps
Asia Menik Farm IDP Shelter Map (Zones 0 - 3) Vavuniya District, Sri Lanka


Background information



URL: http://www.alertnet.org/db/an_art/19216/2009/05/15-150212-1.htm

For our full disclaimer and copyright information please visit http://www.alertnet.org