Email 
Print 
UN aid chief urges free movement for Sri Lanka's war-displaced
Written by: Megan Rowling
U.N. aid chief John Holmes (L) talks with civilians during a visit to Menik Farm camp in northern Sri Lanka, April 2009.
United Nations/Handout
United Nations/Handout
The Sri Lankan government should move faster on allowing freedom of movement for nearly 300,000 war-displaced civilians living in camps to prevent them becoming "internment" facilities, the U.N.'s top aid official says. Following the end of the civil war in mid-May, Colombo argues it needs time to weed out suspected Liberation Tigers of Tamil Eelam (LTTE) rebels, who may be mixing with residents, before permitting people to move in and out of the camps in the north. But John Holmes, the U.N. under-secretary-general for humanitarian affairs, told AlertNet the screening process is moving too slowly. "The LTTE was a very brutal movement, so the government has legitimate concerns about making sure the kinds of activities they were undertaking do not recur," he said in an interview. "On the other hand, the longer this goes on, the more they will become the internment camps we do not want to see, and would not be able to help with, so that's why we need to see some rapid progress in this area." The United Nations is now more worried about the issue of freedom of movement than living conditions in camps, which are getting better every day, according to Holmes. More land is being cleared and more tents are being put up to relieve overcrowding. Sanitation facilities are also improving, bringing conditions closer to international humanitarian standards, although there is still some way to go. Holmes - who visited Sri Lanka with U.N. Secretary-General Ban Ki-Moon in late May - said Colombo should rapidly screen people in camps, separating out those it is suspicious of and providing the rest with identity cards so they can move around to look for lost family members - "a huge problem" for many uprooted by the conflict. So far only some elderly people have been allowed to leave, and while there are plans to give permission to other vulnerable groups including the disabled, Holmes said this is not yet happening at a satisfactory pace. EASING RESTRICTIONS Another major concern for aid agencies has been government-imposed restrictions on their access to camps, particularly the main Menik Farm site, which is home to around quarter of a million people, including tens of thousands who were trapped for weeks in the conflict zone during the final stage of the war. Holmes said the government agreed last week to ease curbs on the number and type of relief group vehicles entering Menik Farm, which had been a major hindrance to humanitarian activities because of the camp's sprawling size. "The question is how consistently this (agreement) is being applied, so we're still monitoring that," he said. "But we are able to work in this one very large camp, so I think that will work itself out." However, discussions with the government on giving the United Nations and other aid agencies access to the former war zone on the northeastern coast have yet to make any progress. This is essential for understanding the extent of the problems facing recovery and reconstruction activities, Holmes said. "We need to move forward on this area because it's relevant to how fast the resettlement process can go, which is in turn absolutely vital for the political reconciliation process, which is fundamental," he explained. Obstacles include concerns over groups of rebels who may still be in the Vanni region, as well as the dangers posed by landmines and other unexploded weaponry. Sri Lanka has said it plans to resettle most of the displaced within six months, but aid workers warn their return is likely to take considerably longer - especially if funding for both the humanitarian and recovery operations continues to fall short of requirements. ABUSES PROBE UNLIKELY? Relations between Colombo and some donor governments have been strained by allegations of abuses of human rights and international humanitarian law during the conflict - although these have been levelled at both sides. Holmes said the best way to resolve the issue would be to launch an investigation, which the government appeared to agree to when it signed a joint statement after his recent visit with Ban Ki-Moon. As yet, the United Nations has no plans for such an inquiry, and the U.N. Human Rights Council last month decided against a probe of possible war crimes, mainly due to opposition from Colombo and other sympathetic governments. Holmes said there is a risk the allegations may not be investigated at all, but he does not expect the controversy to hamper the humanitarian response in the north. "There's no logical connection between that and the continuation of the aid operation which needs to go forward under its own steam and in its own right because there are nearly 300,000 people who are in desperate need of help," he said.
Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.
3 responses to “UN aid chief urges free movement for Sri Lanka's war-displaced ”
Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
Leave a Reply
When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.
Unlike some other content on this website, the written content in this article may be republished or redistributed by any means free of charge. Any use of photographs and graphics on this website is expressly prohibited. You must check whether written content contained in other articles on this website may be republished or redistributed without the express permission of Reuters or the relevant third party provider.
12 Jun 2009 02:35:59 GMT
Free movement for at least one displaced in a family and all those over sixty years should be guaranteed so that these 300,000 displaced can settle out the most day to day problems. How long will these security clearance will take for these poor IDPs, already nearly 100,000 of them are over one month housed in these camps. How many of them have been cleared so far and how long will these poor displaced will continue in these unhealthy security camps.
It is the duty of UN and other international human rights organisations, these displaced are not housed permanently in these camps preventing their's resettlement in their own villages. Every day these displaced suffer the inhuman treatments under the army is going to increase the economic problems of Srilanka. These displaced are experienced farmers and fisherman from northern Srilanka and the contribution they give to local economy will suffer if they are not resettled soon. This is a historic humanitarian crisis in Srilanka, as a Buddhist nation by torturing these displaced in these unhealthy security camps, only the Karma and sin will go to the Rulers.12 Jun 2009 02:37:38 GMT
The resettlement has started in earnest, as is reported in the past few days in the government controlled media, (see http://www.dailynews.lk/2009/06/09/news01.asp ) The underlying message however is that it will take another 2 years for the people in Menic Farm to return to their homes. Because that is how long the people from Musali have been waiting in the Mannar camps, and they were not allowed freedom of movement. In fact until recently aid agencies did not have free and unrestricted access to these +//3//f/9-old+//3//f/9 camps in Mannar as well.
John Holmes is right in his assumption that the internment in the camps will last, since it was only last week that the Sri Lanka secretary of Foreign Affairs has said in an interview with the BBC +//3//f/9-Everyone (IDPs, sic) there has to be carefully screened, adding that it was "quite likely" that even many elderly people were "with the LTTE, at least mentally". When John Holmes visited the last time it was mentioned by the GoSL that restrictions on movement would be lifted and that elderly would be released. At that the GoSL had promised to provide ID cards and facilitate elderly and vulnerable groups to leave the camps. The GoSL had also promised unimpeded access by agencies to the camps. What has happened in the time between his visits? All this is making the role of the UN very dubious, taking into account that on one hand its support of the GoSL in its humanitarian efforts, while senior officials such as Pillay, Holmes & Ban Ki Moon have all raised the issues of investigations into the events in the No Fire Zone or Safe Zone during the last weeks of the conflict. UN staff in country should take this stand in a more persistent manner, if the organization wants to maintain some credibility with the International Community. And all the calls for investigations into war crimes are making no waves if the UN high commission for human rights remains as weak as the UN country team in taking a firm stand. Alternatively there could be a call for an inquest into the number of people killed, rather than how they were killed and by whom as is proposed (see http://taps4all.org/index.php?14 Jun 2009 17:38:13 GMT
The resettlement has started in earnest, as is reported in the past few days in the government controlled media, (see http://www.dailynews.lk/2009/06/09/news01.asp ) The underlying message however is that it will take another 2 years for the people in Menic Farm to return to their homes. Because that is how long the people from Musali have been waiting in the Mannar camps, and they were not allowed freedom of movement. In fact until recently aid agencies did not have free and unrestricted access to these +//3//f/9-old+//3//f/9 camps in Mannar as well.
John Holmes is right in his assumption that the internment in the camps will last, since it was only last week that the Sri Lanka secretary of Foreign Affairs has said in an interview with the BBC +//3//f/9-Everyone (IDPs, sic) there has to be carefully screened, adding that it was "quite likely" that even many elderly people were "with the LTTE, at least mentally". When John Holmes visited the last time it was mentioned by the GoSL that restrictions on movement would be lifted and that elderly would be released. At that the GoSL had promised to provide ID cards and facilitate elderly and vulnerable groups to leave the camps. The GoSL had also promised unimpeded access by agencies to the camps. What has happened in the time between his visits? It is also making the role of the UN very dubious, taking into account that on one hand its support of the GoSL in its humanitarian efforts, while senior officials such as Pillay, Holmes & Ban Ki Moon have all raised the issues of investigations into the events in the No Fire Zone or Safe Zone during the last weeks of the conflict. UN staff in country should take this stand in a more persistent manner, if the organization wants to maintain some credibility with the International Community. And all the calls for investigations into war crimes are making no waves if the UN high commission for human rights remains as weak as the UN country team in taking a firm stand. Alternatively there could be a call for an inquest into the number of people killed, rather than how they were killed and by whom as is proposed (see http://taps4all.org/index.php?