Wed, 14:15 12 Nov 2008 GMT17

 
War films seek to buck the 'feel-bad' factor
10 Jan 2008 10:35:00 GMT
Written by: Megan Rowling
Actor Daniel Radcliffe. REUTERS/Luke MacGregor
Actor Daniel Radcliffe. REUTERS/Luke MacGregor

In the United States, at least, 2007 was judged to be a pretty bad year for war films. As Edward Helmore noted in the Observer last month, a clutch of multi-million dollar movies on conflict and terrorism - including Lambs for Lions, Rendition and The Kingdom - got the big thumbs down from moviegoers and critics alike, pretty much bombing at the box office.

But why? One explanation is people have simply had enough of war, and don't want it shoved down their throats in their leisure time too (the liberal view). Or perhaps they don't welcome criticism of the troops when they're still being killed and injured in the field (the conservative view).

Helmore suggests that audiences "seem to be reacting against the lazy uniformity of Hollywood liberalism" - which fails to question its assumption that you can oppose the war in Iraq while still rallying behind the troops.

Yet another interpretation is that movies have just become too depressing. Helmore quotes Variety editor Peter Bart, who observed in a column last October, "Now, I'm not a cinematic philistine; I applaud filmmakers for dealing with real issues in the real world. At the same time, the feel-bad genre (which is only in its early stages) is becoming downright oppressive. Filmgoers have a right to ask: When do we get some comic relief?"

Now, I'm not a film critic, so I'm afraid I can't give you an exhaustive analysis of whether the boom in "feel-bad movies" is about to crash. But over the holidays, I spotted a couple of interesting projects that could help buck the trend.

There was the news, again in the Observer, that Harry Potter star Daniel Radcliffe is due to swap his school blazer for a flak jacket, playing the part of Dan Eldon - a young photographer killed in Mogadishu in 1993 while working for Reuters - in a film called Journey, which will be based on his tragically short but prolific career.

Eldon was one of four journalists stoned to death by an angry mob after a botched bombing by international forces in Somalia killed and injured dozens of civilians. He left behind 17 journals documenting his work in Africa, which were compiled into a book, "The Journey is the Destination", selling more than 200,000 copies.

Eldon's mother Kathy told the Observer she'd met and turned down several other stars eager to play her son, but Radcliffe fits the bill perfectly because of the many parallels between the two - not least a global outlook, magic and poetry.

And for those looking for feel-good films about war, Journey seems to fit the bill. "The film is a teen coming of age story - entertaining, funny, dark at times - but ultimately triumphant," Kathy is quoted as saying. "People will leave the cinema feeling inspired, thinking: "Oh my God, let me start living right now!" It won't be pious. We're not trying to idolise him or make him or a hero."

Filming is due to start this year in Kenya, with profits going to the Creative Visions Foundation, which supports artistic activists trying to raise awareness and motivate people to take action on social, humanitarian and environmental issues.

Another forthcoming drama hoping to shed new light on the challenges of covering conflict in Africa is "Taking the Flak", a six-part BBC comedy said to be based on the experiences of the British broadcaster's world affairs editor, John Simpson. According to the BBC, it's "an acerbic, authentic and caustic comedy that covers the entire progress of a small African war, as seen through the eyes of a team of journalists sending back the nightly reports for the BBC 'Ten'".

The BBC Two press material for the winter/spring 2008 season continues: "The team includes the smooth, veteran correspondent; the harassed, but infinitely resourceful, producer; and the green and gauche rookie stringer, dropped into a hotel and forced to choose between a room on 'the shooting side' and 'the mortar side'." So not too many stereotypes then!

A senior source involved in the production told the Observer: "The series really makes fun of what it's like to be a reporter in a war zone - it's a bit like Drop the Dead Donkey meets The Constant Gardener and it's very funny."

War's no laughing matter, but providing this series can be humourous and nuanced at the same time (and it's a big ask), a light-hearted take on the subject could be just what's needed to get conflict-fatigued viewers watching again.

Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.

Del.icio.us Del.icio.us  |   Digg Digg  |   NewsVine NewsVine  |   Reddit Reddit   
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.

5 responses to “War films seek to buck the 'feel-bad' factor”

Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
  1. Valerie Honey. says:

    I have been taking note of the slew of films that seemed to appear last year. Topics mainly War. Was it mostly the American Involvement and Allies? In my day it used to be called Propaganda. Or am I way off base?

  2. john karol says:

    Please remember. That the best defining film about war ever made was. All is quiet on the Western Front.

  3. waine uk says:

    So you want some comic releif, I bet the people in Iraq and Afganistan share your sentiment, unfortunatly for them war is a reality not a glossy film. I feel for those who are fed up with the war films, might do them a power of good if they actually went to a war zone and see what their politicians have exacted on the people, in there illegal activities.

  4. Peter says:

    They did bad because they were of an anti-war leftist bent that Hollywood is trying to push. Look at the receipts for Iron Man, which was against the terrorists, and pro US.....did kinda well didn't it. Americans are more tired of Hollywood and other moonbat liberals bashing the US than they are of war. On Oct 3 a movie called "An American Carol" is to be released...just watch the box office on that one and you'll see what America thinks.

  5. pedro says:

    This piece insults me. I think its about as biased as anything on CNN. I would have expected more from reuters. To do a story about how to get people watching war films again is appalling. Glorifying a blatant misuse of Media for propaganda purposes is not honorable or objective, and certainly steps out of the realm of journalism. Infotainment is for the news vehicles not for news agencies. Had it been balanced and explored the first idea that maybe people are just against war, then maybe there would be some objectivity in this piece, but as it were, it sounds awfully american in ideology.

Leave a Reply

Enter the code shown on on the left *

When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.

Unlike some other content on this website, the written content in this article may be republished or redistributed by any means free of charge. Any use of photographs and graphics on this website is expressly prohibited. You must check whether written content contained in other articles on this website may be republished or redistributed without the express permission of Reuters or the relevant third party provider.

Before joining AlertNet, Megan Rowling worked as a freelance print and television journalist in Britain, France and Japan. At AlertNet, she focuses on the humanitarian impact of climate change. In 2008, she also spent several months working part-time as a media relations officer for the British Red Cross. She recently completed an MSc in development management.

Latest bloggers




URL: http://www.alertnet.org/db/blogs/20316/2008/00/10-103537-1.htm

For our full disclaimer and copyright information please visit http://www.alertnet.org