MEDIAWATCH: The Geneva Conventions' 60th birthday
Written by: James Kilner

The Convention for the Amelioration of the Condition of the Wounded in Armies in the Field, signed in 1864, is pictured at the Red Cross Museum in Geneva July 31, 2009. REUTERS/Denis Balibouse
Sixty years ago, 64 countries signed the Geneva Conventions which lay out laws to protect wounded combatants, prisoners of war and civilians during war. In 1949 the world was trying to recover from the horrors of World War Two. Since then all of the world's 194 countries have signed at least some part of the Geneva Conventions. And there have been plenty of opportunities to see whether the conventions work in practice. In The Huffington Post, Oxfam International spokesman Louis Belanger said that although the Geneva Conventions had been undermined in recent wars, they were still a vital cornerstone for humanitarian law. "In light of this it would be easy to say that the Conventions have failed," Belanger wrote after listing a series of cases where governments had broken the Conventions. "This attitude is intellectually lazy and deeply unhelpful. We should react to their endemic violations with anger and determination, not resignation." In London’s Guardian newspaper, the head of the British Red Cross Nick Young said the conventions were important to limit the atrocities of war, a point also made by the Daily Telegraph . "The fact that the rules are broken does not mean they should be dispensed with. The Conventions still provide a benchmark for proper behaviour in circumstances that otherwise make brutality easy," the Telegraph wrote in an editorial. But as this Reuters AlertNet story pointed out, most people in the world’s most violent places either don't know the Geneva Conventions exist or believe they are not effective. Australian broadcaster ABC carried a story on its Web site which said that 40 percent of people believe its acceptable to torture an enemy soldier to obtain important military information – clearly against the Geneva Convention. "The survey of over 1,000 people by the Australian Red Cross found two in five believed torturing to obtain important military information was OK, even though most knew it was illegal," the story stated. In the Philippines, the Business Mirror newspaper used the 60th anniversary of the Geneva Conventions to reflect on the bravery of aid workers and to call on the conventions to be updated. "Beyond August 12, it’s a good time to remember the unsung heroes of war and disaster—if we could only break away, briefly, from the lure of destructive politics," the newspaper writes. And Jakob Kellenberger, the head of International Committee of the Red Cross which acts as the conventions' guardian, said that they where as relevant now as they were 60 years ago. "Sixty years ago, the Geneva Conventions were born out of the horrors experienced by millions of people during the Second World War and its aftermath," he said. "The essential spirit of the Geneva Conventions – to uphold human life and dignity even in the midst of armed conflict – is as important now as it was 60 years ago."
Reuters AlertNet is not responsible for the content of external websites.
We welcome argument but AlertNet will not publish comments that are racist, abusive or libellous.
1 response to “MEDIAWATCH: The Geneva Conventions' 60th birthday”
Please note that comments should not be regarded as the views of Reuters.
Leave a Reply
When you submit a comment to us we request your name, e-mail address and optionally a link to a website. Please note where you submit a website address, we may link to it via your name. By sending us a comment, you accept that we have the right to show the comment and your name to users. Although we require your email address, this will not be published on the site, and is only required to enable us to check facts with you, e.g. if you are making a claim we can not confirm easily. Additionally, if you would like your comment removed at anytime, you'll have to use this e-mail address when you contact us. To remove a comment at any time please e-mail us at blogs-(at)-reuters-(dot)-com (address obscured to avoid spam) specifying who you are and what you would like removed. We moderate all comments and will publish everything that advances the post directly or with relevant tangential information. We reserve the right to edit comments in order to maintain the quality of the comments, and may not include links to irrelevant material. We try not to publish comments that we think are offensive or appear to pass you off as another person, and we will be conservative if comments may be considered libelous. Reuters will use your data in accordance with Reuters privacy policy. Reuters Group is primarily responsible for managing your data. As Reuters is a global company your data will be transferred and available internationally, including in countries which do not have privacy laws but Reuters seeks to comply with its privacy policy.
Unlike some other content on this website, the written content in this article may be republished or redistributed by any means free of charge. Any use of photographs and graphics on this website is expressly prohibited. You must check whether written content contained in other articles on this website may be republished or redistributed without the express permission of Reuters or the relevant third party provider.





14 Aug 2009 17:03:43 GMT
History was created sixty years ago when at least sixty four countries coming out just from the atrocities of world war II agreed to sign the convention of Geneva declarations. Till today many lives and wounded in conflict were able to get the attentions of the humanitarian needs attend because of this valued humane agreement. But still for it many countries and rebel armies have little regards for the implementation of this war of rules in some conflict areas.
How can the peace loving world act so that to make all countries and rebel forces fighting for justice can be made always to abide by these Geneva convention laws.It is only by another agreement among all these nations to set up an international court of law, where all violators of these rules of war and other human rights abuses will be punished.